Publication Ethic

INTECH - Informatics and Technology is published 2 (two) times a year in May and November by the Informatics Study Program, Faculty of Engineering and Computers, Baturaja University which was published for the first time in 2020. The purpose of the INTECH Journal is as a means for publishing papers/articles in the field of Science and Information Technology in the field of using computers, internet, software and hardware in the field of information technology. In addition, the INTECH journal also covers areas that support the integration and development of technology in other fields.

Journal Publication Ethics Guide

The peer-reviewed publication of articles on INTECH - Informatics And Technology is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on ethical standards of expected behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Publisher and Editor

The Informatics Education Study Program as a publisher of INTECH takes the duty of trusteeship at all stages of publication very seriously and we recognize ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Informatics and Editorial Education Study Program will assist in communication with other useful and necessary journals and/or publishers.

Publication Decisions: INTECH Editors are responsible for determining which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The intended validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by legal requirements as they apply in the future due to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may speak with other editors and reviewers to make these decisions.

Be fair: An editor at all times evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than prospective authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and other publishers.

Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Review

Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the paper.

Accuracy: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that his brief review will not be possible must inform the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality: Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be indicated or discussed with anyone other than as authorized by the editors.

Standards of Objectivity: The review must be conducted objectively. The author's personal criticism is untrue. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that the observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention to any substantial equivalence or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers to personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Any privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts as having conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships, relationships, or relationships with the paper's associated authors, companies, or institutions.

Author

Reporting standards: Authors of original research reports must provide an accurate employment report and an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately represented on paper. Papers should contain enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements